Showing posts with label Obama and Clinton. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Obama and Clinton. Show all posts

Nov 17, 2008

Team of Rivals: Clinton Takes SOS Job

Clinton to Accept Secretary of State Job
-or-
How to Keep Your Friends Close, but Keep Shiv Threats Closer

Barack Obama, during the Democratic primaries, cited as influential to his thinking the book "Team Of Rivals," about Abraham Lincoln's opponent-stocked cabinet. It would appear this was more than mere campaign puffery: Obama's former presidential rival Hillary Clinton has accepted an offer to join the president-elect's cabinet as Secretary of State, according to a report in Britain's Guardian, and now here on Blasphemes.

Faced with the prospect of Hillary constantly campaigning against him in the Senate - Obama brings her into the fold. Whether this was part of the deal to keep the knife fight out of Denver (where she could have legitimately made a case for a roll call vote and had the Super Delegates get involved to take the nomination) or just a case of keeping the bitch under wraps with an Administration gag order, we'll have to read about 30-40 years from now. Hell, she may even quit three years into it.

Just look at Powell in the Bush Administration. Speak up once - and get frozen out of the Administration and possibly politics forever.

The flaw in the argument is that Obama is Lincoln.

The Team of Rivals note comes from the Doris Kearns Goodwin book on Abraham Lincoln. The premise of the Goodwin book is of Lincoln’s political genius by examining his relationships with three men he selected for his cabinet, all of whom were opponents for the Republican nomination in 1860. All fine and well - but unlike Obama, Lincoln argued on a national level for years about issues such as the Mexican War, tariffs, abolition, Texas annexation, the Wilmot Proviso, economic development in the relatively new nation, and of course Lincoln pretty much founded the Republican Party after the collapse of the Whigs. So, some consolidation was necessary.

When Lincoln ran for President in 1860 he addressed the question of a house divided at the Cooper Union in New York and ran a campaign of important ideas in an increasingly divided nation. In contrast, Obama’s entire campaign was empty, undefined, “change.”

As Lincoln was sworn in as president in March 1861 seven states had already left the Union. The issues of states rights versus a strong central government, agrarian society versus industrial society, new states as slave or free states, and abolition of slavery were all the same argument. The attack by the rebel states on the Union’s Fort Sumter in Charleston on April 12, 1861 began the bloodshed that had been bubbling to the surface since Independence.

The very able Lincoln realized the then much smaller nation needed a unity government and so Lincoln created a unity government - his Team of Rivals. Which, in my opinion, should be viewed as a gathering of a majority, not unlike a multi-party country like Italy or Germany.

To top it off, John McCain has also been sucked into this Obama silliness too. John McCain is promising Obama assistance and cooperation too.

Now maybe, just maybe, this is "change" in the sense of people putting aside differences to get something done. IF this is the case, it will take my cynical heart a while to thaw out for the refreshing new car smell. But I smell something different...

I smell a future scapegoat for Obama to pin any failure on. It's insane that Hillary or Bill would fall for this obvious trap. Trap or good will, it doesn't matter which because her fate is now tied to Obama's.

Could have been funnier though. He could have picked John Kerry.

Jun 3, 2008

The Democratic Nominee is Near

"what'd he say?"

AP has called it.

Obama has the numbers to be the Democratic Nominee.










Jun 2, 2008

Speculation on Capitulation

Clinton Aides: Tomorrow Night's Speech Isn't Concession. No. Really.
(my source)

Senior Clinton campaign aides privy to the construction of tomorrow night's election night celebration in New York insist that Sen. Clinton will not use the occasion to drop out of the race.
They project that Clinton will do better than expected in South Dakota, losing by a margin of less than ten points; they project a sizable loss in Montana.

Meanwhile, NBC News reports Bill Clinton, "acknowledging the campaign's likely fate," said in South Dakota that "this may be the last day I'm ever involved in a campaign of this kind."
Mr. Clinton, aides said, was referring to the end of the primary season -- there are no remaining places for him to campaign for his wife -- and did not attempt to foreshadow her departure.

We shall see. I still think she's got some fight in her - and she's just biding her time.
Like Scott Smith vs. Pete Sell comeback or Matt Hughes vs Carlos Newton. Hell - remember Glen Close in Fatal Attraction... yeah, that's much more like it.

Frankly, I'll believe it once she's 100% out... kicking and screaming and being escorted off the Denver convention floor.

Why was Hillary never able to take out Obama? She had dirt on him, and either used it too late, or when she did - she'd make a mistake by opening her damn mouth. Every time she spoke (just like with Giuliani) the less people liked her. For instance, she just said, "I have won more states than Senator Obama." Hey, I'm bad at math - but if you throw out the results in 38 of the 50 states, that statement becomes true.

God that's good comedy. Please stay in HillDog. We at Blasphemes need the material.

May 22, 2008

It just keeps going



For as God Like or R-Kelly like the painting suggests, our good friend Karl Rove wonders, why can't Obama just put Hillary away? This is a good question. Karl said in an interview, “The problems that Barack Obama has with working class voters are real, and they’re not going away. It’s cultural. They view him as an elitist — as somebody who’s condescending and doesn’t share their values.” Way to use established talking points... Hillary's talking points, I might add.

Also, in Rove’s opinion, “Obama should not have gone [back] to Iowa and said, ‘I’ve got a majority of the elected delegates.’ Let somebody else do that. He should have focused on substance, not try to say, ‘[look at me], I’m ahead.’”

The issue will ultimately be settled by the Democratic National Committee, when its Credentials Committee meets next Saturday to making a final ruling on the heated dispute.

Does Clinton have a chance at seating some of those delegates?

“She might have a chance with the committee,” Rove says, “because it’s set up in a certain way where she has a lot of friends on the committee.”

And then there's Florida and Michigan, which if seated, would put her behind by a mere 50. 50. If you wonder why she's not dropping out - that's it. She can still take this thing, by golly.



May 20, 2008

Duper Tuesday

Another week, another split primary contest, right?

Hilldog is poised to "win" Kentucky (hmm... should she have had some fried chicken there?)

While Obama is favored to win in Oregon, where opinion polls give him a lead between 4 percentage points and double-digits. The two states have a combined 103 delegates at stake on Tuesday. But that doesn't matter - because...

Obama is going to drink Hillary's milkshake - tonight!

While Obama will probably still be about 50 to 75 delegates short of the 2,026 needed to win the nomination, he has decided this high water mark will send more undecided superdelegates flooding his way. (see I can write for the AP...)

"A clear majority of elected delegates will send an unmistakable message -- the people have spoken and they are ready for change," Obama campaign manager David Plouffe said in an e-mail message to supporters.

So tonight, in Iowa - and he's going to declare that he's beaten Hillary Clinton in the contest.

Be looking for that, it ought to be funny. I wonder if Hillary will get to have a rebuttal, the same way they have a Democrat speak after the State of the Union address? Now that'd be even funnier!

May 14, 2008

Someone Fart?

Edwards gives long-expected and awaited endorsement to Obama

It was just a matter of timing.

I'm guessing the timing was probably strategically used to turn eyes away from the incredible number of racists in the Democratic Party (what?! I had no idea there were racists in the Democratic Party! Get out of here!) and perhaps used to take the steam out of the huge, huge victory Hillary had last night.


Caption Contest on the photo:
Here's my entry-
"See that? She just crapped her pants."

May 12, 2008

Hillary Isn't Going Anywhere

If you're the betting kind, I wouldn't put any chips down on when Hillary will be leaving. Bloomberg.com puts it into perspective today - and it's always as simple as following the money.

Bottom line - Hilldog has put 16 Million (and that's the figure they've disclosed) of the Clinton fortune in to her being able to put all the White House furniture back the way they like it... and in some cases, actually bring pieces of furniture back to the White House that they've been, er, borrowing?

Anyhow - the best part of the article is that it's all John McCain's fault that she will have to stay in it to get her cash back. At least, until the convention.
Clinton loaned her struggling campaign $11 million in recent months. A little-known provision of a 2002 campaign- finance law cosponsored by McCain prevents candidates who drop out of the race from raising money after the nominating conventions to repay themselves for personal loans.

Should Clinton fail to come up with the funds by the Democratic convention in August, she'll be out the $11 million. If she quits the campaign before then, she may find it hard to get people to keep giving cash just so she can retire her debt.
Before you Republicans and Operation Chaos fans start wringing your hands, all of Hilldog's problems go away if Obama just cuts a check.

$11 million? Cheep!

May 8, 2008

Obama Emails

The hoax e-mails that paint Democratic presidential front-runner Barack Obama as unpatriotic and as a clandestine Muslim are still having an impact on voters' perception of the Illinois senator, reports a Wednesday story the New York Daily News.

The Daily News quotes a couple of Indiana voters' fears, based on their perception that Obama is really an anti-American Muslim.

Which got me thinking - I've heard these stories since Feb 2007, when Obama announced he was running. Where did these stories come from?

If Hillary's people started them - and they're obviously wrong - other than just pure fear and racism, what goal would these phony emails create?

Maybe they would encourage voters or the 'popular media' to look into Obama's real religion... which would point them straight to Rev. Jeremiah Wright? And since Wright's church sells their sermons on CD and DVD - it wouldn't take long for someone to say, "No, he's no Muslim, friend. But he IS a member of a nutty racist black church. Here... watch this..."

Now, the trouble with this theory is that the stories of the emails only really got traction in Iowa. It was in December - and that's when two Hillary campaign workers were fired for sending the smear emails to Iowa voters.

Just a thought, and as hairy and underhanded as it is for the initial smear email - if the Jeremiah Wright business ends Obama's career - Hillary's sneaky attack shows political prowess that I didn't think she had.

Still -OMG he doesn't say the pledge of allegiance or wear a flag pin!

May 6, 2008

Thunderdome Continues

Clinton pulled off her expected razor thin margin of victory in Indiana. With 85 percent of the votes being reported in the state, she was leading Obama 52 percent to 48 percent. OOooooohhh!

At a rally in Indianapolis, Clinton said that her Indiana victory had "broken the tie."

"And thanks to you, it's full speed to the White House," she said to the cheering crowd.

Obama's North Carolina victory mirrored earlier triumphs in Southern states with large black populations: Georgia, Alabama, Louisiana and South Carolina among them. With 85 percent of the votes in North Carolina being reported, Obama was leading Clinton 56 percent to 42 percent.

And it continues.

May 4, 2008

Hillary's Nuclear Option

The Huffington Post has concluded what OneF and I have been saying since Michigan and Florida moved their primaries and have created a crisis within the Democratic Party. The folks at the Post have finally read Blasphemes and realized that Hillary will force the seating of her delegates that were withheld from MI and FL at the convention. This will give her the delegate edge and put a chokehold on the SuperDelegates who have publicly pledged to vote along with the primary voters. (She's got 'em painted into a corner with that one.)

The guess is that these 55 or so delegates from the banned states would put her over the edge in the Convention battle - and I mean over the edge in the Defcon ready to launch sense. She wins the nomination - but tears the party into nuclear halves by doing so.

They have two caveats to this scenario:

1) Hilldog has to win Indiana and lose North Carolina by only very small margin... or win it. That happens Tuesday.

2) She has to prove she's a better general election candidate than Obama.

Pretty big caveats for her to overcome. However, you must realize by now that this won't be solved by the rank-and-file, it can only be decided by the superior SuperDelegates who have been tricked into a paper bag - and no matter what happens, half of the party regulars will be so outraged their guy or gal didn't get the nomination, they're already planning the riots in Denver.

I know I'm repeating myself - but in a year where the Republicans have practically left the keys to the House, the Senate and the White House in the locks - the Democrats have played like the Marx Brothers and the Three Stooges bumping into each other trying to reach the door.

Between Mucaca and Larry "Wide Stance" Craig, Jack Abramoff, the Plame Affair, Scooter Libby, and ringmaster Karl Rove - you'd think someone in a rainbow wig holding a John 3:16 could win a seat in the next election....

But clowns are all the Democrats have. Nancy Pelosi and her errand boys are completely useless against George Bush and still have lower approval ratings than - George Bush! They continue to roll over on every single issue except for a trade agreement with Columbia. That's about all they've done. Oh, except staple mounds and mounds of earmarks to bills that can't ever hope to make it past Bush's veto. Oooh. And despite all the secret government, darkness, torture and things we won't know about for decades in the Dick Cheney playbook - Pelosi hasn't even reviewed the last six years of the Bush Administration's policies - even though that's exactly why her constituents voted her and her party to the Congress.

Then there's the Hillary/Obama Un-Civil war tearing the party in half - and over what? Their compelling but opposite policy differences? The speedy withdraw of troops from Iraq? The best energy policy? Health Care plans? Cabinet appointees or VP choices? Nope. Nothing of importance - simply race and gender issues. Wait, aren't the Democrats supposed to be the enlightened ones?

Meanwhile, President McCain is being fitted for his Inauguration Ball tuxedo as we speak.

Apr 22, 2008

Obama's Willie Horton Ad?

The National Campaign Fund and Floyd Brown, the political operative behind the controversial Willie Horton ad, is launching a new TV criticizing Sen. Barack Obama for being too easy on gang murderers.



This is weak.

An argument that is like re-using a coffee filter again after making a pot of coffee. The argument is weak. But it has burnt out buildings, dead kids, and 9/11. Oh and a piano plinking. It's sure to be a hit!

Hillary... come on. Call up Karl Rove. He's just sitting there knitting in Texas right now. If you really want a Willie Horton ad - he'll get someone to somehow show that Obama is either related to Willie - or IS Willie...

And I just realized that there are probably a bunch of Gen-Y'ers or a bunch of folks who haven't studied politics in 1988... Willie Horton was the - you know what, google it smart guy.

Apr 18, 2008

Polls Reverse

Goddmaned polls. They've reversed, again. The Associated Press-Yahoo! News poll found that a clear majority of Democratic voters now say Sen. Barack Obama has a better chance of defeating Republican Sen. John McCain in November than Sen. Hillary Rodham Clinton.

It's of Democrats polled... let's look at that methodology. Eff that. Let's look at that picture. One can only IMAGINE the obscenities being said there -
at the very least, the condescending remarks...
Caption Contest?
"Oh, bustin' out the Yellow again, eh?"
"Die in a Fire."
"You first."
"Don't touch me or I'll yell rape."
"You'd like that, wouldn't you?"

Apr 14, 2008

Hillary + Shots = 20 Pts

Hillary jumps to 20-point lead in Pennsylvania

Sen. Obama had drawn even with her just one week ago!

An American Research Group survey April 5-6 had the candidates in a 45-45 tie. But the group's latest polling, April 11-13, has Clinton leading 57-37

One Whiskey, One Bourbon, and one Beeeeerrrrr!

I guess pissing off your base by calling them racists, questioning their commitment to their religion and their love of the Bill of Rights which allows them to have guns wasn't the wisest of political maneuvers? Perhaps such a person running for office shouldn't condescend, attack and smear those folks whose votes you are seeking? And those folks that you want to lead. Me thinks this slip up shows a lack of humility, political prowess and perhaps - perhaps that you do not have the inability to unite people despite one's own claim to the contrary?

Maybe I'm reading into it a tad too much?

Back to HillDog - wouldn't drinking with Hillary be a lot like drinking with your mom?
No, more like your buddy's mom.
Discuss.

Mar 29, 2008

Not Going Anywhere

“There are millions of reasons to continue this race: people in Pennsylvania and Indiana and North Carolina and all of the contests yet to come, this is a very close race and clearly I believe strongly that everyone should have their voices heard and their votes counted and that includes Michigan and Florida.”

Then, she added: “There is a lot still to be done and I’m looking forward to campaigning hard over the next several months.”

This just hours after Senator Patrick Leahy, Democrat of Vermont, said Mrs. Clinton “has every right, but not a very good reason, to remain a candidate for as long as she wants to.”

“Superdelegates should exercise their right and their responsibility to determine who they think would be the best president and who would be the best nominee to defeat John McCain in the fall,” Mrs. Clinton said. “That’s the way our process is set up. That’s the way it will operate.”

On the campaign trail, Sen. Obama mentioned that the race was akin to a good movie, which had lasted too long.

Clinton added, "I like long movies."

Mar 24, 2008

UnCivil War

We have the leading Democrat presidential primary contender Barack Obama campaigning on Hope.

And Change.

And that we can all unify.

Isn't it a little disingenuous since the Democrats have no hope, can't change, and certainly can't unify their party! So, how exactly are they going to unify the country?

Practice saying "the McCain Administration..." "President McCain...."

Mar 19, 2008

Disclosure

Have you noticed that there's been an awful lot of disclosure in the news lately? What's with this 'openness' all the sudden? Is it because of all the drugs in our drinking water?

The NY Gov taken down by a prostitution ring -
Then his replacement, Gov. David Paterson revealed Tuesday that he had affairs with a "number of women," including a state employee, but said that does not affect his ability to lead.
No. His ability to lead will be diminished by the fact that he is blind. Not saying he won't be a great Gov. - I just don't want him to lead the conga line, okay?

Hillary released all those documents she's been hiding - er - preparing for release after redacting half its contents, when no one would notice because of....

Obama's speech yesterday. Perhaps you're aware of it? It was on the news...?
There sure was a lot of praise for his speech. I even heard one pundit say it ranks with the "I have a Dream" speech. Really? Really? Was it that good?

He could have used Rev. Jeremiah Wright as an opportunity to demonstrably move race relations in this nation toward a brighter future, but instead he dredged up the past. And it was a past that only half of America is old enough to have experienced. I'm sure we all want to move beyond. Rather than using this opportunity, he went on to rail about wealth, income, and the education gap. But those three handicaps haven't stopped Obama or his story. Is there any chance that the fawning media will point out this little hypocrisy? More importantly, why couldn't he use his story to try to unite us, bring us hope, and bring us together? Instead, I fear that he may have fallen into a trap -

-which is exactly where Hillary wants him -

The newest poll showed Obama had only a statistically insignificant lead of 47 percent to 44 percent over Clinton, down sharply from a 14 point edge he held over her in February when he was riding the tide of 10 straight victories.

Meanwhile, John McCain has gained on them BOTH. Sorry, President John McCain.

Mar 7, 2008

UnCivil War

The drawn out-drag out Democratic fight has gone from fake friendly to all out un-Civil War. Despite warnings, the two candidates will tear the party in half, fracture the system, disenfranchise their voters and (possibly) attract swing voters to McCain.

Consider the following:

  • $Cash$: Both sides are now swimming with the cash that politicians need to wage war. Obama announced this week that he raised a stunning $55 million in February. Clinton hasn't matched those numbers, but she is playing catch-up. Since Tuesday, she raked in $3 million. No word if that was from her own purse or from Hollywood.

  • 'Monster' Hillary: Obama foreign policy aide Samantha Power told Britain's Scotsman that Clinton is "a monster . . . she is stooping to anything" and described her circle as being on the "warpath." Expect "Gloves off" "mud slinging" "cock-punch" and other euphemisms for dirty fighting to start falling out of people's mouths.

  • "3AM" - that ad was the Fort Sumter of negative TV ads. Some pundits credit this ad with her Texas and Ohio wins. I'm not so sure. But even if they think it worked, assume that they're going gloves off, shivs ready here on out.

  • Ken Starr: Clinton's campaign lashed out at Obama Thursday, accusing him of becoming another "Ken Starr" because he promised to be more criticial of his opponent. The Obama campaign has complained Clinton has dragged her feat in releasing her tax returns and her documents as first lady.

  • Florida and Michigan. As mentioned many times before, Obama and Clinton camps are deadlocked on the matter of the Florida and Michigan delegates. DNC Party Chairman Howard Dean says he wants a new vote in those states but he won't use party money to pay for it. That benefits Obama, because Clinton would have likely won those states in a re-vote. If Dean and the Obama can keep the current slate of Florida and Michigan delegates off the convention floor, Clinton's position is further undermined. This is complicated, much like Missouri.

  • Revolt: Influential African-Americans like Donna Brazile, Al Sharpton and former Virginia Gov. Douglas Wilder are warning that the Democratic Party may be fractured and crippled if it does not abide by the will of the pledged delegates in picking the nominee... which is what I'm saying right now too. Wow, I agree with Al Sharpton?
  • Playing by the Rules

    Let's face it, Obama doesn’t have an impressive record of experience or a unique policy profile.

    New politics is all he’s got.

    If he loses that? Then he loses everything.

    According to today's Op-Ed in the NYTimes - "Playing by Clinton Rules," David Brooks thinks that if Obama loses his magic and gets into the mud with Hillary, she'll kick his ass.

    The theory was that if Obama could inspire a grass-roots movement with a new kind of leadership, he could ride it to the White House and end gridlock in Washington. Obama has built his entire campaign on this theory. He’s run against negativity and cheap-shot campaigning. He’s claimed that there’s an “awakening” in this country — people “hungry for a different kind of politics.”

    This message has made him the front-runner. It has brought millions of new voters into politics. It has given him grounds to fend off attacks. In debate after debate, he has accused Hillary Clinton and others of practicing the old kind of politics. When he was under assault in South Carolina, he rose above the barrage and made the Clintons look sleazy.

    But supporters have been yelling for him to get off his high horse and take a ball peen hammer to Hillary's kankles. [I'm paraphrasing a tad] And especially now that her attack ads (appear) to have worked, and he's chalked up two losses* (nevermind that he WON the Texas Caucus... but we don't want facts to get into the way of discussing politics).

    The problem, the article contends, is that eventually you have to get off the horse and get dirty. You can't win, especially against Clinton Inc., without dirt. Brooks contends that while Obama's campaign thinks they can win a mud slinging contest, Hillary will pull a knife out.

    Mar 6, 2008

    Gettin' Ugly

    DNC Chairman Howard Dean had a testy conversation with NBC's David Gregory, highlighted by this exchange:

    DAVID GREGORY: Governor, are you worried at this point about the perception for the Democratic party? You've got Florida, Michigan whose delegates may be decided by the state party, the elite of the party, the insiders of the party, and it could come down in this nomination fight to the super-delegates, also the elite and the insiders of the party, deciding this. Is this democracy in the Democratic party?

    HOWARD DEAN: David, this argument you're making is complete nonsense. There are a set of rules that everybody knew about when we started this out.

    Dean went on to claim he'd be "happy" even if the super-delegates were to decide the nominee, just so long as the rules are followed.

    Sure. If Obama goes to the convention with an elected-delegate lead, but Hillary walks away with the nomination thanks to the super-delegates, Dean could be presiding over a fractured Dem party. There might even be some retro-1968 convention action.

    Feb 28, 2008

    Notes on the Trail

    Who first made a big deal of Obama's middle name? Sen. Bob Kerrey (D-NE).

    Who ran around and talked about him selling drugs, and maybe being a coke dealer? Clinton Co-Chair Bill Shaheen.

    Who started playing the race card? Bob Johnson of BET.

    Who was caught for sending an email claiming he's a Muslim? From their campaign office?

    Who released the picture of Obama in the turban?

    Methinks' Twas no Rebublican, English.