
Ahem. Let me begin.
Science fiction television writers, I understand that using religion in your work is compelling and new, and can even bring in new audiences. Perhaps you'll get a few thousand of the folks who bought the 'Left Behind' series of books about the Rapture? What a nice demographic.
Perhaps, as storytellers, you find the religious aspect of your shows -- and I'm not speaking specifically to characters with strong faith, but instead on your entire narrative arch of the plot ending in a religious tone or in the case of Lost, and the Battlestar Galactica, the religious crescendo. Maybe you're reacting to the world where ancient mysticism and regular church going isn't compatible with iPads and frozen chicken dinners? The mysterious world of witches and magic are bottled and packaged as Disney characters for toddlers, and we're out of touch with our ancient mythology. You see an opportunity to tap into these simple stories, and have found compelling ways to repackage them and sell advertising.

Twin Peaks had the black and white lodges - pretty basic stuff there too, really. And X-files had the mysterious mythology that they would drag out and kick around in-between monster-of-the-week episodes, that dealt with urban legends and ancient mysticism... and UFO's are grouped in there too for good measure.
So Lost and Battlestar come after these highlights in science fiction, and exploit the mysticism storyline as well. It was just a bit TOO much and TOO blatant for yours truly.
Let me make one request. You keep religion out of my sci-fi, and I'll keep my science out of religion? Deal?
I won't ask how the velocity of David's sling could have possibly taken down Goliath - as there's no way it could have caused enough head trauma. I won't ask how Lot's wife turned into a pillar of salt - was that figurative or literal? And what was the street value of that pillar of salt in antiquity? How about Jesus turning water into wine - was that an Ocean's 11, or Jesus's 13 kind of caper involving a hilarious Vaudevillian double switch? I'll just let those things slide as long as we never see a religious ending to shows with time-travel or space ships.
Not that I hated the ending last night - as they would have had to have plotted it out in advance. Battlestar, though, really was pulled out and thrown on the wall to see if it would stick. The first couple seasons were awesome, and the Jewish robots going after the heathen Zodiac worshiping people was great. There were analogies to the Iraq war, 9/11, religion - great stuff and mirroring our world and telling a morality tale = which I'll be the first to say is what makes great science fiction. But they should be left ambiguously, not literal.
But, that said, the best shows to tackle morality tales were the Twilight Zone and the original Star Trek. Automan, Manimal, and Man from Atlantis? Not so much.
And while answering questions, and finishing hanging story nuggets - the ending quietly ties up those threads by saying, did that one little red herring really have anything to do with how it ended, no - now quit obsessing, Nerd Fan. Okay, well, I don't have a choice -- but were you, as writers, being lazy or were you tossing around red herrings in case your ending didn't work? I don't care that you didn't explain what the Island was or what the glowing thing was, but then you kind of did... but my point was to KEEP it vague and not tell us the Force is midichlorians.
And you did do that, but not with the characters.

Then it really is about fate vs choice -- which was a major theme throughout the show.
So Lost disappointed me. There was a very heavy religious 'Defending Your Life' ending to the entire program. How much was real? The island was, but the pocket alternate universe, not as much. Does it matter? Is it worth watching? Probably. Will I have fond memories of the show. Kind of, but I'm still going to always think that the ending was a cop-out.
3 comments:
I just did a Google search for "keep religion out of sci-fi", looking for something to sooth my rage over the Lost finale and I found this post. I am your new superfan.
They used a lot of symbolism from ancient religions (and more contemporary ones, e.g. Christian and Jack Shepard, Jacob) to suggest that they were all hinting at some universal truth, a protoreligion of fact that's being grasped at in parts but never on the whole. Most of the focused religions place an emphasis on a complete cycle of death and rebirth as necessary opposites that create one another. The series has also been chock full of other binary opposites that create one another through their opposition (the existence of science creates the need to have faith, for example).
By "moving on", the survivors accepted their deaths, entered into the Light at the heart of the Island, and created it anew, beginning the cycle over again. "There is no now" because "now" has not started and has already ended. They are between creations.
I forgot to mention that the final conversation between Jack and Christian took place in front of a stained glass window featuring the symbols of all the major world religions, just to drive the point home a bit more.
As for religious robots, I would actually give them some slack for being so fervent in their reverence and faith. After all, provided there was not "battle in Heaven"/AI rebellion, they would truly be able to interact with their creator/God, rather than our 2,000+ alleged conversations.
Faith is the anti-thesis of reason, and I find that the LOST crowd did a good job stumping for either camp as it were.
What disappointed me about the show is how much of all the build up of all the past six or so seasons meant nothing, or much less than we thought. Dharma was a bunch of goofball hippies who set off a giant EMP bomb. The Others were just misdirected zealots.
When I find myself asking too many questions about the intricacies of the show, I just remember that is simply that, a TV show.
Post a Comment