Aug 17, 2006

Howard come home!

I am sure you have all heard the news. Looks like it is illegal to wiretap without a warrant. Here is the decision for you lawyering types. Here is the main section (at least to me).
"The wiretapping program here in litigation has undisputably been continued for at least five years, it has undisputably been implemented without regard to FISA . . . and obviously in violation of the Fourth Amendment."
Correct me if I am wrong but should thw word be "indisputably?"

I know there are many questions from the Blasphemes community (from the comments I assume that means me, Killre, and Cap'n). Well, we are in negotiations with Howard to continue working with us. He is unsure if he would like to keep this gig or move to Iran to plant some "nuclear seeds" so that this country will not be as embarrassed this time. He also has an offer from the Lieberman campaign helping to "keep the vote in." The picture on the right is Howard discussing opportunities with Mr. 34.

I am in agreement with Howard that the government should be able to eavesdrop on any citizen of the US it wants without a warrant or even a reason. What court will allow you to tap into your opponents phone line and listen to their campaign strategies? Next they will try to tell us that it is illegal to break into opponents headquarters and place wiretaps and photograph documents. Sheesh, how are we supposed to keep this country safe from people with differing opinions?

I think each president should announce which Constitutional Amendments they will and will not follow when they enter office. Then we all know what rules (or lack of them) we are following. Republicans can take away those annoying 19th and 15th and the entire Bill of Rights (except 2nd amendment, of course). The Democrats (assuming they can win without 19th and 15th amendments) could remove the 2nd and 22nd and we would all be happy. At least they would tell us we are happy. And that should be enough. You don't hate America, do you?

No comments: